|Version 6 (modified by 11 years ago) ( diff ),|
Implementation of Universal_String use several techniques to speedup performance and minimize memory footprint:
- string data stored in UTF-16 encoded form internally, so it occupies two times less memory then Wide_Wide_String for most modern languages.
- use of implicit sharing (also known as copy-on-write) technology allows Universal_String to have constant time of assignment operation.
- use of atomic operations to handle reference counter makes Universal_String as safe in multitasking context as other Ada types.
- use of special algorithms and utilization of SIMD operations (when available) significantly improve performance.
Here is comparison of performance between Ada.Strings.Wide_Unbounded and League.Strings packages. Number is a speedup of operations on Universal_String comparing to corresponding operation on Unbounded_Wide_String.
|Operation||GNAT GPL 2010/League||GNAT GPL 2010/League|
|(portable, 64 bits)||(x86_64)|
|(1/10/100/1000/10000 bytes)||(1/10/100/1000/10000 bytes)|
|Assignment of empty string||1.91||1.84|
|Assignment of non-empty string||1.03||1.06|
|Compare for equality||4.63/6.40/9.46/11.76/11.88||4.12/6.56/15.49/19.95/15.09|
|Compare for less||1.16/1.02/1.56/1.50/1.50||1.08/1.09/2.55/3.55/2.79|
|Append of string||1.30||1.30|